ENAQT Optimal-Noise Scan¶
Abstract¶
BL-87 provides a bounded local simulator for environment-assisted quantum transport (ENAQT). It scans a finite set of local dephasing rates and maximises the population irreversibly transferred into a target sink by a fixed time. The committed evidence contains one disordered-chain intermediate optimum and two negative controls. This is scenario-specific transport evidence, not a universal noise optimum or a synchronisation, biological, hardware, or consciousness result.
Introduction and literature boundary¶
Plenio and Huelga showed that local dephasing can improve excitation transport in selected dissipative quantum networks. Mohseni and co-authors studied the corresponding environment-assisted transfer mechanism in a model of the FMO photosynthetic complex. Those results motivate a transport-efficiency scan; they do not license replacing efficiency with a phase estimator or transferring the conclusion to Kuramoto synchronisation, BKT physics, consciousness, or a physical noise-control policy.
- M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, “Dephasing-assisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules,” New Journal of Physics 10, 113019 (2008), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/11/113019, arXiv:0807.4902.
- M. Mohseni, P. Rebentrost, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, “Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer,” Journal of Chemical Physics 129, 174106 (2008), doi:10.1063/1.3002335, arXiv:0805.2741.
Methodology¶
The model uses a single-excitation site basis augmented by orthogonal sink and
loss states. For a real symmetric hopping matrix K and site energies ω, the
network Hamiltonian is
Each site has a local dephasing jump operator with rate γ. The target has an irreversible sink jump with rate κ, and every site may recombine into a loss state with rate μ. The full trace-preserving Lindblad equation is propagated with the exponential action of a matrix-free generator.
For a chosen horizon T, transfer efficiency is the final sink population
The scanner reports the best sampled γ, the exact zero-dephasing endpoint, the largest-scanned-γ endpoint, and whether the best grid point is strictly interior and exceeds both endpoints by a configured minimum. The largest finite dephasing rate is deliberately called “high noise,” not a classical limit.
import numpy as np
from scpn_quantum_control.analysis import enaqt_scan
K = np.zeros((4, 4), dtype=np.float64)
for site in range(3):
K[site, site + 1] = K[site + 1, site] = 1.0
result = enaqt_scan(
K,
np.array([0.0, 3.0, -2.0, 1.0]),
gamma_range=np.array([0.0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 30.0]),
t_evolve=10.0,
)
assert result.has_intermediate_optimum
assert result.optimal_gamma == 3.0
optimal_r, r_values, coherent_r, and classical_r remain read-only
compatibility aliases. They now return transport-efficiency values; the
classical_r name does not assert that the finite high-noise endpoint is a
classical limit. New code should use the explicit efficiency fields.
Results¶
Regenerate the committed JSON and Markdown evidence with:
| Scenario | γ* | η(0) | η(γ*) | High-noise η | Ratio | Interior? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disordered four-site chain | 3 | 0.0522739 | 0.1765650 | 0.0114666 | 3.37769 | yes |
| Uniform three-site chain | 0 | 0.8195421 | 0.8195421 | 0.0714405 | 1 | no |
| Disconnected target | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | no |
The first row demonstrates the intended intermediate-noise effect on one frozen
finite model. The second shows that dephasing can be strictly detrimental. The
third checks that dephasing does not create a transport path absent from the
Hamiltonian. Every row is replayed and digest-bound in
data/enaqt_product/bl87_enaqt_evidence.json.
Conclusion and control boundary¶
BL-87 closes a local simulator and evidence lane. It does not expose a noise setpoint controller: an optimum depends on the network, horizon, sink/loss rates, dephasing model, and sampled grid. Using a simulated γ* to alter a provider, QPU, laboratory noise source, biological system, or plant requires a separately authorised and calibrated control protocol. No such protocol is implemented here.
BL-50's QFI/QNG geometry and BL-60's future chimera/multiscale synchronisation targets remain separate scientific lanes. This transport scan neither consumes their observables nor promotes a transport optimum into a geometry or synchronisation result.