Release Readiness Gate¶

Date added: 2026-05-18

Purpose¶

This is the release control page for software changes that touch stable contracts, core evidence, or claim-facing documentation. It gives teams one deterministic route to prove what is and is not safe to ship.

Use this gate before tagging:

release managers preparing a package tag;
reviewers closing a milestone;
any PR that changes release-blocking artefacts, contracts, or claim tables.

What it governs¶

The page is a blocker policy for artefact-backed releases. It governs:

version consistency across public package metadata,
licence and commercial-route consistency across metadata, docs, and headers,
stable-contract fixture and capability generation reproducibility,
coverage and behavioural gating thresholds,
open-surface scientific gaps that remain bounded until explicit gates pass.

This page records the release-blocker closure path for the next package tag. The release decision is no longer based on scattered manual judgement across coverage, behavioural-test quality, source ingestion, and scientific claim boundaries. The deterministic gate is:

./.venv-linux/bin/python tools/audit_release_readiness.py --fail-on-blocker

The audit composes six release checks:

For teams shipping with this repository¶

These checks exist to separate “works on my machine” from releasable outcomes. They were designed so that:

claims are tied to committed artefacts, not prose-only;
changes to core interfaces are checked against contracts;
source-accounting and performance/validation gates are explicit before a new tag.

If you are preparing a pilot, demo, or publication-facing release, this is the single place to prove that the same route is repeatable across machines.

Check	Release meaning
Version consistency	`pyproject.toml`, package `__version__`, `CITATION.cff`, and `.zenodo.json` carry the same version.
Required release artefacts	Coverage, behavioural-test, K_nm, stable core contracts, stable core contract fixtures, backend capability artefacts, release coverage exclusions, and S2 blocker artefacts are present.
Coverage gap gate	A fresh `coverage.xml` exists, aggregate package coverage meets the release threshold, and unjustified missing files are blocked. Intentional CPU-only omissions must be listed in `release_coverage_exclusions.json`. Per-file gaps remain reported; `--fail-on-file-gap` can promote them to hard blockers.
Behavioural quality gate	Tests satisfy the smoke-only, assertion-density, and exception-contract-density thresholds.
Licence readiness gate	`pyproject.toml`, `LICENSE`, README, `core_package_boundary.md`, `licensing_faq.md`, and source/tool SPDX headers agree that this repository is `AGPL-3.0-or-later` with a commercial route until an approved split changes all surfaces.
Core-artifact determinism	Stable core contracts and backend capability artefacts are reproducible from committed metadata, and exported digests are checked before tagging.

For any package tag or public release note touching stable-core contracts or backend capabilities, the preferred gate is:

scpn-bench stable-core-release-gate

The bundle is a no-QPU reproducibility command that composes:

scpn-bench stable-core-capability-gate
scpn-bench stable-core-contract-gate
scpn-bench stable-core-preflight-gate

Use component gates only for targeted component-only verification.

Coverage and test-quality closure boundary¶

The release gate keeps coverage and behavioural value enforceable without pretending that total line coverage is already 100 percent. A fresh coverage XML report is required for tag readiness. The default CI gate blocks on aggregate coverage below 70 percent and unjustified missing files. Per-file gaps remain a release follow-up queue unless explicitly promoted to hard blockers with --fail-on-file-gap. The 100 percent coverage target remains a future improvement, not a blocker for tagging a bounded release.

Reviewed release-audit notes and local coverage exclusions are internal operational artefacts, not part of the public documentation site. Hand-maintained source files remain under the normal coverage and behavioural-quality gates.

The same closed-set discipline applies to stable core contracts and backend capability artefacts. These artefacts are not only generated for runtime use; they are treated as release-blocking evidence surfaces alongside version, coverage, and behavioural gates.

For package tags or public release notes that touch stable-core contract shape, adaptor boundaries, or contract-facing text, add:

scpn-bench stable-core-contract-gate

For tags that change stable-core preflight fixture expectations, add:

scpn-bench stable-core-preflight-gate

Scientific gap closure boundary¶

Open scientific questions do not block a software release when their claim boundaries are enforced by hard gates. The current release boundary is:

Gap	Release gate
K_nm measured-system validation	Required release artefacts include the EEG PLV, IEEE 5-bus, and IEEE 14-bus comparison payloads plus the measured-coupling checklist. Physical-validation promotion remains blocked unless units, uncertainty, full pairwise coverage, tolerance, response, and null-model requirements pass.
TCBO `p_H1` reproduction	Promotion remains blocked without a named preregistered dataset and uncertainty crossing the threshold gate.
S2/S5 broad advantage	IBM advantage readiness remains blocked until the full benchmark matrix, hardware rows, and claim-boundary requirements pass.
S7 logical-level DLA parity	Required release artefacts include the logical-DLA roadmap JSON and Markdown note. DLA parity survival under logical encoding remains blocked until the theory, logical-observable, and simulation prerequisites pass.
S8 adaptive branching	Required release artefacts include the adaptive-branching readiness JSON and Markdown note. Adaptive advantage remains blocked until backend dynamic-circuit support, preregistration, and equal-depth open-loop falsification pass.
S9 quantum thermodynamics	Required release artefacts include the quantum-thermodynamics readiness JSON and Markdown note. Entropy-production peak claims remain blocked until theory review, classical reference, raw-count execution, and falsification controls pass.
S10 analog-native Kuramoto	Required release artefacts include the analog-native readiness JSON and Markdown note. Analog advantage and provider-execution claims remain blocked until calibrated provider SDK construction, matched-tolerance digital baselines, and raw execution records pass.
S11 sync-order quantum sensing	Required release artefacts include the quantum-sensing readiness JSON and Markdown note. Sensing-advantage claims remain blocked until a preregistered perturbation benchmark, classical Fisher baseline, hardware shot budget, and raw-count uncertainty archive pass.

This means the release can be tagged when software gates pass. It does not mean that source ingestion, simulator output, or partial benchmark rows have become external scientific validation.

Synchronisation benchmark release gate¶

Before any tag that touches benchmark code, benchmark registry rows, generated benchmark artefacts, or paper-facing benchmark claims, run:

scpn-bench sync-benchmark-gate

The gate regenerates the standardised synchronisation benchmark registry, regenerates all committed no-QPU reference rows, and then runs the multi-instance comparator. It is a no-QPU release gate: it must not submit IBM or other hardware jobs, and it must not promote quantum-advantage or hardware performance claims.

The release audit now treats the synchronisation benchmark registry, n=4/n=8 reference rows, and public benchmark pages as required release artefacts.

S7 logical-DLA roadmap gate¶

Before any tag that touches logical-level DLA parity, fault-tolerant outlook, or post-NISQ QEC claims, run:

scpn-bench s7-logical-dla-roadmap

The gate regenerates the S7 logical-DLA parity resource table and roadmap note. It is offline, performs no hardware submission, and keeps DLA parity survival claims blocked until the representation-theory and logical-observable work is complete.

S8 adaptive-branching readiness gate¶

Before any tag that touches mid-circuit adaptive branching, dynamic-circuit feedback, or adaptive-advantage framing, run:

scpn-bench s8-adaptive-branching-readiness

The gate regenerates the S8 branch-policy table and readiness note. It is offline, performs no hardware submission, and keeps adaptive-advantage claims blocked until backend support and the preregistered equal-depth comparison pass.

S9 quantum-thermodynamics readiness gate¶

Before any tag that touches entropy-production, irreversibility, heat-current, or quantum-thermodynamics synchronisation-transition claims, run:

scpn-bench s9-quantum-thermo-readiness

The gate regenerates the S9 calibrated-observable K-sweep readiness table and public note. It is offline, performs no hardware submission, and keeps thermodynamic peak claims blocked until the formalism, classical reference, and preregistered raw-count comparison pass.

S10 analog-native readiness gate¶

Before any tag that touches analog-native Kuramoto backends, provider exports, or analog-advantage framing, run:

scpn-bench s10-analog-native-readiness

The gate regenerates the S10 primitive-accounting table and provider-readiness note. It is offline, performs no hardware submission, and keeps analog advantage claims blocked until provider SDK construction, calibrated unit constraints, matched-tolerance digital baselines, and raw execution records pass.

S11 quantum-sensing readiness gate¶

Before any tag that touches QFI-based sensing, synchronisation-order sensing, or sensing-advantage framing, run:

scpn-bench s11-quantum-sensing-readiness

The gate regenerates the S11 QFI/classical-Fisher proxy table and public note. It is offline, performs no hardware submission, and keeps sensing-advantage claims blocked until the preregistered perturbation benchmark, classical Fisher baseline, shot budget, and raw-count uncertainty archive pass.

Symmetry-sector mitigation release gate¶

Before any tag that touches symmetry-sector mitigation planning, planner fixtures, or mitigation-eligibility claims, run:

scpn-bench symmetry-sector-mitigation-gate

The gate regenerates the committed planner-fixture JSON and public fixture summary, then compares the regenerated planner output against the committed artefact. The gate is offline, does not submit hardware jobs, and only locks the planner eligibility/blocker contract.

Stable-core release/repro gate¶

When release notes, API docs, or tags touch stable-core claims, run:

scpn-bench stable-core-release-gate

This preferred gate is no-QPU and reproducible. It is composed of:

scpn-bench stable-core-capability-gate
scpn-bench stable-core-contract-gate
scpn-bench stable-core-preflight-gate

Use these component gates for isolated changes to only one stable-core surface.

Hardware result-pack release gate¶

Any tag, paper-facing update, website update, or release note that cites promoted IBM hardware evidence must attach a hardware result-pack evidence packet. The packet records three facts that must stay together:

verifier output from scpn-verify-hardware-packs --json;
deterministic export digests from scpn-verify-hardware-packs --export-dir ... --json;
reproduction logs for every cited pack's count-to-statistic command.

The packet schema and checklist are defined in hardware_result_pack_release_checklist.md. The release audit accepts the packet through:

./.venv-linux/bin/python tools/audit_release_readiness.py \
  --fail-on-blocker \
  --hardware-result-pack-evidence private internal records/releases/<packet>.json

If a release does not cite promoted hardware evidence, record that decision in the release notes. Do not cite raw-count hardware claims from README, website, papers, or release notes without the evidence packet.

Tagging procedure¶

Before tagging:

Generate a fresh coverage XML report with the release test command.
Run scpn-bench sync-benchmark-gate if the release touches benchmark code, benchmark registry rows, generated benchmark artefacts, or benchmark claims.
Run scpn-bench stable-core-release-gate if the release touches stable-core contracts, contract fixtures, capability claims, or stable-core API text.
Run scpn-bench stable-core-preflight-gate if the release changes stable-core preflight fixtures or preflight-facing API/docs text.
Run scpn-bench symmetry-sector-mitigation-gate if the release touches symmetry-sector mitigation planning, planner fixtures, or mitigation claims.
If the release cites promoted hardware evidence, generate the hardware result-pack evidence packet and pass it to the release audit.
Confirm intentional CPU-only coverage omissions are justified in release_coverage_exclusions.json.
Run tools/audit_release_readiness.py --fail-on-blocker with the hardware result-pack evidence argument when applicable.
Run the scoped docs build and version-consistency checks.
Commit with the required authorship line after staged-diff audit.
Push the commit and wait for CI before creating a release tag.

0.10.0 release, v0.10 surface, and documentation scope¶

The 0.10.0 source release packages the post-0.9.12 control-surface expansion and documentation alignment. It does not promote broad quantum advantage, live hardware RNG, FIPS-140 cryptographic validation, Vivado synthesis on public CI, intra-shot QPU feedback, clinical validation, or unbounded hardware-gradient execution.

The release scope is:

version-consistent pyproject.toml, CITATION.cff, .zenodo.json, README, capability manifest, Studio federation manifest, documentation site pages, changelog entries, and reproducibility metadata;
public guide routes for QRNG streaming, ML-DSA-65/PQC trigger signing, UltraScale+ HLS pulse generation, NV-centre 20 T magnetometry, FRC pulsed-shot QAOA scheduling, realtime loop telemetry, Studio federation, and Kuramoto variant/acceleration workflows;
an expanded example gallery covering every numbered example file, including the no-credential v0.10 quickstarts;
a release-readiness gate that reflects the current repository ownership: Paper 0 artefacts are no longer package release blockers because the Paper 0 register was intentionally extracted to the GOTM root;
local documentation, version, behaviour-quality, release-readiness, build, and package checks before push, followed by green GitHub Actions before tagging.

0.9.12 release, documentation, and repository-hygiene scope¶

The 0.9.12 source release packages the June 2026 differentiable-programming hardening queue and refreshes the public documentation surface so first-time users can understand the software, its applications, its commercial route, and its claim boundaries before reading subsystem internals. It does not promote broad quantum advantage, clinical validation, arbitrary simulator autodiff, or unbounded hardware-gradient execution.

The release scope is:

version-consistent pyproject.toml, CITATION.cff, .zenodo.json, README, capability manifest, documentation site pages, and changelog entries;
README, site home, onboarding, tutorials, notebook guide, API overview, and release-readiness pages that route users by job, evidence class, and adoption objective;
differentiable-programming additions from the current queue, including bounded QNN/QNode gradient, convergence, framework, finite-shot, stochastic, Rust/PyO3 parity, and compiler/adapter evidence surfaces already committed in the release branch;
explicit benchmark classification boundaries: non-isolated rows remain local regression or functional evidence, while production performance wording still requires isolated-affinity artefacts;
GitHub push, tag, CI validation, security-alert inspection, open-PR review, and safe Actions/deployment cleanup before public release promotion.

0.9.11 documentation, native AD, and release-polish scope¶

The 0.9.11 source release packages the latest documentation and differentiable-programming hardening round. It does not promote arbitrary program AD, hardware gradients, full ML-framework-native autodiff, or broad quantum advantage. The release scope is:

public docs now route first-time users through onboarding, applications, tutorials, notebooks, differentiable programming, and claim boundaries before low-level APIs;
version-consistent pyproject.toml, CITATION.cff, .zenodo.json, capability manifest, README snapshot, reproducibility metadata, and release notes;
native compiler-backed whole-program AD determinant support widened from helper-backed 6x6-16x16 to verified 6x6-19x19;
static dense 20x20+ determinant traces are explicitly documented as fail-closed after strict native verification rejected the current helper formulation;
repository hygiene remains bound by module-specific tests, release-readiness gates, security scans, and GitHub CI before public promotion.

0.9.10 documentation and differentiable-programming release scope¶

The 0.9.10 source release aligns the public documentation with the current differentiable-programming implementation state. It does not promote arbitrary program AD, hardware gradients, full ML-framework-native autodiff, or broad quantum advantage. The release scope is:

clearer README, onboarding, tutorial, notebook, API, and gradient-route entry points;
version-consistent pyproject.toml, CITATION.cff, .zenodo.json, capability manifest, and reproducibility metadata;
explicit support boundaries for parameter-shift, composed objectives, provider-gradient readiness, transform nesting, compiler/program AD primitives, and unsupported routes;
continued requirement that hardware and scientific claims cite committed evidence artefacts before promotion.

0.9.9 release-documentation scope¶

The 0.9.9 source release documentation surface adds a public differentiable-programming route. The release docs must explain parameter-shift gradient support, compiler/program AD boundaries, public API entry points, planned tape/framework-adapter work, notebooks, benchmarks, and fail-closed unsupported scenarios without promoting roadmap items as completed features.

0.9.8 release-documentation scope¶

The 0.9.8 source release documentation surface is required to explain the project before users reach low-level APIs. At minimum, the public site must include:

onboarding overview with purpose, user routes, application lanes, commercial route, and claim boundaries;
quickstart route that runs without IBM credentials;
tutorials and notebook maps that separate exploration from release evidence;
API overview that points users to stable facades first;
hardware and release-readiness pages that keep simulator, hardware, and open scientific claims separated.

This documentation scope is a release artefact because misunderstanding the claim boundary is a product and scientific safety risk.