SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later¶
Commercial license available¶
© Concepts 1996-2026 Miroslav Sotek. All rights reserved.¶
© Code 2020-2026 Miroslav Sotek. All rights reserved.¶
ORCID: 0009-0009-3560-0851¶
Contact: www.anulum.li | protoscience@anulum.li¶
scpn-quantum-control - QPU Provider Readiness Matrix¶
QPU Provider Readiness Matrix¶
This document prepares the SCPN stack for allocation requests across known accessible QPU families. The goal is not to hard-code one vendor; the goal is to make every provider an instance of the same compute-unit contract:
QPU data artifact -> compute request -> provider adapter
-> result artifact -> fusion / memory / controller
Provider availability changes. Before any submitted proposal or paid run, refresh the provider status from the official console or documentation.
Provider classes¶
| Class | Examples | Best fit in SCPN pipeline |
|---|---|---|
| Superconducting gate-model | IBM, Rigetti, IQM, QCI preview | Wide circuits, hardware-native graph layouts, fast queue experiments, DLA and synchronisation witnesses. |
| Trapped-ion gate-model | IonQ, Quantinuum, AQT | All-to-all connectivity, deeper small-N circuits, mid-circuit measurement where available. |
| Neutral-atom analog/digital | QuEra, Pasqal | Direct oscillator-network and analog Hamiltonian experiments, graph geometry, Rydberg dynamics. |
| Annealing / hybrid optimisation | D-Wave Leap | QUBO/Ising scheduling, routing, intervention ranking, coarse optimisation subproblems. |
| Photonic / continuous-variable | Quandela, Xanadu-style platforms where accessible | Bosonic/CV synchronisation and sampling-oriented feature generation. |
| Simulator / emulator / resource estimator | Braket simulators, Azure provider simulators, Quantinuum emulators, local Aer, Rust paths | Preflight, shadow execution, calibration, cost avoidance, reproducibility. |
Access matrix¶
| Access route | Publicly documented providers | Adapter priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Quantum | IBM superconducting QPUs including Eagle and Heron families. | Existing first-class path. | Query available backends per account; do not assume a named backend is always available. |
| Amazon Braket | AQT, IonQ, IQM, QuEra, Rigetti, plus managed simulators. | High. | Single cloud surface for several modalities; useful for multi-provider routing. |
| Azure Quantum | IonQ, Pasqal, Quantinuum, Rigetti, plus simulators and resource estimation. | High. | Good proposal surface because provider credits and target availability are documented by workspace/region. |
| IQM Resonance / direct IQM server | IQM superconducting QPUs and Qiskit-on-IQM fake/facade backends. | High. | Direct European superconducting replication route for IBM-sensitive circuit witnesses. |
| IonQ Quantum Cloud | IonQ direct access to simulators and trapped-ion QPUs. | High. | Direct route for Aria/Forte-family work and research-credit applications. |
| Quantinuum Systems / Nexus | Quantinuum hardware, emulators, syntax checkers. | High. | Strong fit for mid-circuit measurement, all-to-all trapped-ion circuits, and hardware-credit accounting. |
| Pasqal Cloud | Neutral-atom QPU and emulators. | Medium-high. | Strong fit for analog oscillator-network experiments and Rydberg geometry. |
| D-Wave Leap | Advantage annealer and hybrid solvers. | Medium. | Not a gate-model backend; route only optimisation kernels, not circuit witnesses. |
| Other direct research programmes | Provider-specific previews and national lab allocations. | Case-by-case. | Must satisfy the same node descriptor and result artifact contract before use. |
Node descriptor¶
Every accessible backend becomes a QPUNodeDescriptor:
| Field | Required meaning |
|---|---|
node_id |
Stable internal name, e.g. aws.ionq.forte_1 or ibm.heron_r2. |
access_route |
ibm, aws_braket, azure_quantum, ionq_cloud, quantinuum, pasqal, dwave, or local. |
provider |
Hardware provider. |
modality |
superconducting, trapped_ion, neutral_atom, annealer, photonic, simulator. |
execution_model |
gate_model, analog_hamiltonian, annealing, hybrid_solver, emulator. |
latency_class |
batch, near_real_time, or real_time_candidate. |
qubit_or_variable_limit |
Current account-visible limit. |
native_features |
Connectivity, native gates, analog controls, mid-circuit measurement, reset, pulse control. |
cost_model |
Shots, credits, task price, QPU time, HQC/AQT, or provider-specific unit. |
queue_model |
Immediate, reserved, windowed, commercial period, or batch queue. |
kernel_capabilities |
SCPN kernels allowed on the node. |
calibration_snapshot |
Timestamped backend quality metadata when available. |
verification_status |
unverified, simulator_green, syntax_green, hardware_probe_green, or production_ready. |
The broker must route by descriptor fields, not by hard-coded backend names.
The descriptor schema is implemented in
scpn_quantum_control.qpu_compute.QPUNodeDescriptor. Provider adapters
must emit that object before any job can be considered routable.
Kernel routing¶
| SCPN kernel | Preferred modalities | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronisation witness | Superconducting, trapped-ion, neutral-atom | Direct circuit or analog measurement of phase/coherence structure. |
| DLA parity witness | Superconducting, trapped-ion | Needs controlled circuit structure and reliable parity readout. |
| OTOC / scrambling | Trapped-ion, superconducting, high-fidelity simulator | Deeper coherent circuits benefit from all-to-all or high-quality transpilation. |
| Quantum feature map | Superconducting, trapped-ion, simulator | Classical ML interface can tolerate batched samples and compare across providers. |
| Analog Kuramoto / Rydberg graph | Neutral-atom | Native geometry and interaction physics align with oscillator-network structure. |
| Variational control | Simulator first, then superconducting/trapped-ion | Requires many iterations; hardware only after simulator and budget gates pass. |
| Intervention ranking / scheduling | D-Wave hybrid, CPU/Rust optimiser, simulator | Optimisation kernel, not a gate-model observable. |
| Backend calibration probe | Every provider used | Required before trusting a hardware campaign. |
Adapter responsibilities¶
Each provider adapter must implement the same stages:
capabilities()- return aQPUNodeDescriptor.validate_request(request)- reject incompatible kernels before cost is incurred.compile(request)- translate the SCPN kernel into provider-native representation.estimate_cost(compiled)- return provider-unit and project-budget estimates.submit(compiled)- submit only after budget and idempotency gates.retrieve(job_ref)- retrieve counts, samples, energies, or analog observables.normalise_result(raw)- emit the common result artifact.classify_observables(result)- mark each value as measured, mitigated, simulated, emulator-derived, or model proxy.
No adapter may hide an unavailable provider by silently switching to a different backend. A fallback is allowed only when the compute request declares it.
Proposal-ready allocation package¶
When applying for resources, the dossier should include:
- scientific objective and real-world application
- kernel family requested
- input artifact schema and example artifact hash
- expected circuit/analog workload shape
- requested provider class and why that modality is appropriate
- simulator preflight evidence
- cost estimate and budget guard
- data-management plan for job ids, counts, and result artifacts
- risk plan for queue delays, calibration drift, and failed jobs
- publication-safe provenance statement
- ethical/safety statement for real-world control use
The strongest allocation argument is not "we want QPU time." It is:
We have a provider-neutral pipeline, simulator preflight, typed
artifacts, budget controls, and a precise kernel that maps to this
provider's hardware advantage.
Provider-specific fit¶
IBM Quantum¶
Use for superconducting gate-model experiments, DLA parity, structured Kuramoto circuits, Qiskit Runtime integration, and Heron/Eagle-family hardware comparison. Strong current fit because Quantum Control already has Qiskit/IBM runtime paths.
Readiness requirement:
- account-visible backend descriptor
- calibration snapshot
- transpiled depth/two-qubit-gate budget
- simulator or Aer preflight
- hardware micro-probe before full campaign
Amazon Braket¶
Use as a multi-provider broker surface. Braket currently documents QPU access for AQT, IonQ, IQM, QuEra, and Rigetti, plus simulators. This is important because one access route can cover trapped-ion, superconducting, and neutral-atom modalities.
Readiness requirement:
- ARN-based node descriptor
- task batching policy
- S3/output artifact mapping
- provider-specific result normalisation
Azure Quantum¶
Use for provider diversity, proposal credits, QIR/Q# interoperability, and access to IonQ, Pasqal, Quantinuum, and Rigetti targets where available by region/account.
Readiness requirement:
- workspace/provider/target descriptor
- pricing unit mapping
- region availability check
- simulator/syntax-checker preflight where available
IonQ Cloud¶
Use for trapped-ion all-to-all circuits, smaller but deeper feature maps, and native-gate experiments. IonQ documents direct cloud access, SDKs, API keys, job dashboards, simulators, and Aria/Forte-family systems.
Readiness requirement:
- target and algorithmic-qubit descriptor
- native-gate or Qiskit compilation path
- quota and research-credit tracking
- all-to-all routing policy
Quantinuum¶
Use for high-fidelity trapped-ion circuits, mid-circuit measurement, conditional logic, emulators, and syntax checkers. Quantinuum's hardware-credit model should be represented explicitly in the budget.
Readiness requirement:
- syntax-checker pass before hardware
- emulator comparison
- HQC/eHQC cost estimate
- mid-circuit measurement capability flags
Pasqal and QuEra¶
Use for neutral-atom and Rydberg-native oscillator-network experiments. These are the natural candidates for analog Kuramoto, graph geometry, and Hamiltonian simulation variants where Trotterisation is the wrong abstraction.
Readiness requirement:
- geometry/register descriptor
- analog Hamiltonian parameter bounds
- emulator preflight
- measured observable mapping into the common result artifact
IQM¶
Use for superconducting diversity beyond IBM while keeping the Qiskit
circuit path close to the existing Kuramoto-XY, DLA parity, and FIM
workflows. The built-in iqm adapter uses Qiskit-on-IQM and is
approval-gated for remote execution. Local IQM fake backends are suitable
for syntax and topology preflight, but they are not hardware evidence.
Readiness requirement:
iqm-client[qiskit]installed in an isolated runner environment such as.venv-iqm; current IQM client releases pin Qiskit below the main IBM/Qiskit environment used by this repository- fake/facade backend preflight for the selected circuit family
- explicit IQM server URL and quantum-computer name for remote runs
- topology/native-gate translation recorded in the artefact ledger
- calibration snapshot or provider metadata captured where available
- micro-probe counts before any full witness campaign
Rigetti¶
Use for superconducting diversity beyond IBM, especially when routing, native-gate sets, low-latency hybrid workflows, or access through Braket is strategically important.
Readiness requirement:
- topology descriptor
- native-gate translation
- calibration snapshot
- cross-provider witness comparison plan
D-Wave Leap¶
Use only for optimisation kernels: scheduling, intervention ranking, layout/routing, and QUBO/Ising formulations. Do not route gate-model observables to D-Wave.
Readiness requirement:
- QUBO/Ising mapping
- variable-count estimate
- hybrid solver selection
- result conversion into ranked interventions or schedules
Funding-readiness state machine¶
Every provider starts at unverified and advances only by evidence:
unverified
-> docs_mapped
-> simulator_green
-> syntax_green
-> micro_probe_green
-> allocation_ready
-> production_ready
Definitions:
docs_mapped: public provider docs mapped into a descriptor.simulator_green: local/provider simulator executes our kernel.syntax_green: provider compiler/syntax checker accepts the job.micro_probe_green: tiny hardware job returns valid result artifact.allocation_ready: proposal dossier has objective, budget, preflight, risk, and provenance.production_ready: repeated hardware runs are stable enough for the declared application.
Official documentation references¶
Provider details must be refreshed before submission from official sources:
- IBM Quantum hardware and QPU information: https://www.ibm.com/quantum/hardware, https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/qpu-information
- Amazon Braket hardware providers and devices: https://aws.amazon.com/braket/hardware-providers/, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/braket/latest/developerguide/braket-devices.html
- Azure Quantum providers, targets, and availability: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/provider-global-availability, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/qc-target-list
- IonQ Cloud documentation: https://docs.ionq.com/, https://www.ionq.com/quantum-cloud
- Quantinuum Systems documentation: https://docs.quantinuum.com/h-series/
- IQM Qiskit integration and fake backends: https://docs.iqm.tech/iqm-client/user_guide_qiskit.html, https://docs.iqm.tech/iqm-client/api/iqm.qiskit_iqm.fake_backends.html
- Pasqal Cloud documentation: https://docs.pasqal.com/cloud/
- D-Wave Leap: https://www.dwavequantum.com/quantum-cloud-services/