SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later¶
Commercial license available¶
© Concepts 1996–2026 Miroslav Šotek. All rights reserved.¶
© Code 2020–2026 Miroslav Šotek. All rights reserved.¶
ORCID: 0009-0009-3560-0851¶
Contact: www.anulum.li | protoscience@anulum.li¶
scpn-quantum-control — Falsification Protocol¶
Falsification Protocol¶
A scientific claim is only meaningful if there is an experiment
whose outcome would refute it. This page collects the falsification
criteria for every non-trivial claim scpn-quantum-control
currently makes, so a reader can locate the break point without
reverse-engineering the source.
Each claim has four fields:
- Claim — what we assert.
- Domain of validity — the regime where the claim is supposed to hold.
- Falsifier — the observable result that would refute the claim.
- Current evidence — the experiment or computation on which the claim currently rests.
C1 — DLA dimension formula¶
- Claim. For the heterogeneous XY Hamiltonian \(H = -\sum K_{ij}(X_i X_j + Y_i Y_j) - \sum (\omega_i / 2) Z_i\) with generic (non-degenerate) frequencies on \(N\) qubits, the dynamical Lie algebra has dimension \(\dim(\mathrm{DLA}) = 2^{2N-1} - 2\) and decomposes as \(\mathrm{DLA} = \mathfrak{su}(2^{N-1}) \oplus \mathfrak{su}(2^{N-1})\) acting on the even- and odd-parity subspaces.
- Domain. \(N \ge 2\), all \(\omega_i\) pairwise distinct, all \(K_{ij} \neq 0\) for \(i \neq j\).
- Falsifier. Computing the DLA by nested commutator closure at any \(N \ge 2\) and getting a dimension different from \(2^{2N-1} - 2\). Or finding a non-trivial symmetry beyond \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) parity (which would split the DLA further).
- Evidence. Verified computationally for \(N = 2, 3, 4, 5\) in
analysis/dla_parity_theorem.pyandtests/test_dla_parity_theorem.py. Representation-theoretic argument for all \(N\) (not yet formalised in Lean 4 — the internal gap audit §C Lean 4 entry).
C2 — DLA parity asymmetry on hardware¶
- Claim. On a real superconducting processor, the even-magnetisation sector's post-Trotter leakage is larger than the odd-magnetisation sector's, by a few per cent, and the gap grows with Trotter depth.
- Domain. IBM Heron r2 class hardware at \(n = 4\) qubits, Trotter depths 2–14, XY Hamiltonian with the same \(K_{nm}\) matrix as the classical simulator.
- Falsifier. Any of: (i) mean relative asymmetry for depths \(\ge 4\) drops to \(\le 2\%\) on a new hardware run on the same backend; (ii) the sign flips (odd > even); (iii) Welch's two-sample \(t\)-test returns \(p > 0.05\) on 7 of 8 depths.
- Evidence.
data/phase1_dla_parity/*.json(342 circuits across 4 sub-phases onibm_kingston, April 2026). Mean asymmetry \(+10.8\,\%\) for depth \(\ge 4\), peak \(+17.48\,\%\) at depth 6, Welch \(p < 0.05\) on 7/8 depths, Fisher combined \(\chi^2 = 123.4\) (\(p \ll 10^{-16}\)). Reproducer:tests/test_phase1_dla_parity_reproduces.py.
C3 — \(K_{nm}\) topological mapping¶
- Claim. The SCPN coupling matrix \(K_{nm}\) (exponential-decay, all-to-all, with anchor overrides from Paper 27) correlates strongly with the effective coupling topology of at least two measured physical systems (photosynthesis FMO, EEG alpha-band, ITER MHD modes, IEEE power grid). Josephson junction arrays remain an illustrative comparison until calibration-sourced parameters and coupling edges are supplied.
- Domain. Systems with a natural distance-dependent coupling on a complete graph.
- Falsifier. Spearman \(\rho < 0.5\) on every listed system.
- Evidence. EEG alpha \(\rho = 0.916\), IEEE 5-bus \(\rho = 0.881\),
ITER MHD \(\rho = 0.944\), FMO \(\rho = 0.304\). Josephson array
comparisons must be labelled illustrative unless backed by measured
calibration parameters and coupling edges. See
GAP_CLOSURE_STATUS.md.
C4 — Rust acceleration factors¶
- Claim. Measured Python↔Rust speedups for the functions in
pipeline_performance.md §21stay within a factor of 2 of the published values on a comparable-class runner (Linux x86_64, ≥ 8 cores, ≥ 16 GB RAM). - Domain. The exact five paired benchmarks listed in §21
(
build_knm,kuramoto_euler,correlation_matrix_xy,lindblad_jump_ops_coo,lindblad_anti_hermitian_diag). - Falsifier. The next green CI run of
tests/test_rust_path_benchmarks.pyreports any paired speedup drop of more than 50 % from the published figure. - Evidence. Section §21 of
pipeline_performance.md(measured 2026-04-17 on ML350 Gen8 viatest_rust_path_benchmarks.py).
C14 — Analog-native Kuramoto primitive accounting¶
- Claim. On the fixed S10 readiness benchmark, analog-native Kuramoto compilation uses fewer native coupling primitives than the digital Trotter compilation uses two-qubit gates at the same declared tolerance.
- Domain. The committed S10 readiness benchmark and compiler accounting only; this is not a hardware-performance or analog-advantage claim.
- Falsifier. Digital Trotter compilation reaches a lower two-qubit gate count at the same declared tolerance, or provider validation fails to preserve the native coupling model.
- Evidence.
data/s10_analog_native/analog_native_readiness_2026-05-20.json,docs/analog_native_readiness.md, andtests/test_analog_native_readiness.py.
C15 — Sync-order quantum-sensing gain¶
- Claim. On a preregistered perturbation benchmark, QFI-based sync-order-parameter sensing beats the classical Fisher-information baseline.
- Domain. The committed S11 readiness benchmark records only a no-submit estimate. Hardware or applied-target promotion requires raw counts, uncertainty intervals, and the preregistered classical Fisher estimator.
- Falsifier. The QFI/classical-Fisher ratio is below 1 on the benchmark mean, or the uncertainty interval overlaps or falls below 1.
- Evidence.
data/s11_quantum_sensing/quantum_sensing_readiness_2026-05-20.json,docs/quantum_sensing.md, andtests/test_quantum_sensing_readiness.py.
Open questions (no claim yet)¶
The following items are not claims — they are open problems.
Nothing in scpn-quantum-control depends on any of them being
true. They appear here so a reader knows they are known.
- Gap 2 — quantum result beyond classical. Two readings now distinguished (see classical_irreproducibility.md): the narrow reading (no ideal-Hamiltonian classical simulator can reproduce the observed asymmetry) is closed — every Hamiltonian term commutes with the total-parity operator, so classical leakage is identically zero; the observed hardware asymmetry is therefore a hardware-noise signature, not a property of the Hamiltonian. The broad reading (no efficient classical algorithm at any \(N\)) remains open: classical simulation cost still scales as \(O(\mathrm{poly}(N))\) at \(N \le 16\), so this is not yet a complexity-class claim.
- Gap 3 —
p_h1 = 0.72first principles. The hypothesis that \(p_{h1}\) equals \(A_{\mathrm{HP}} \sqrt{2 / \pi}\) (Hasenbusch-Pinn amplitude times the Nelson-Kosterlitz ratio) is 3 % off the observed value and was initially motivated by a square-lattice coincidence that is independently falsified. It is listed inbkt_universals.pyas the best numerical fit among seven candidate combinations; it is not a derived claim.
When either of these is promoted to a claim, an entry goes in the Claims section above with its own falsifier.