SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later¶
Commercial license available¶
© Concepts 1996–2026 Miroslav Šotek. All rights reserved.¶
© Code 2020–2026 Miroslav Šotek. All rights reserved.¶
ORCID: 0009-0009-3560-0851¶
Contact: www.anulum.li | protoscience@anulum.li¶
SCPN Quantum Control — SCPN/FIM Hamiltonian Paper Plan¶
SCPN/FIM Self-Referential Hamiltonian Paper Plan¶
Date: 2026-05-05
Working title¶
Fisher-information-inspired collective feedback in Kuramoto-XY quantum Hamiltonians
Alternative:
Magnetisation-sector structure induced by a self-referential FIM term in Kuramoto-XY quantum simulation
Purpose¶
This paper is the theory and computational-mechanism track behind the SCPN quantum-control programme. It studies whether a collective Fisher-information-inspired feedback term changes synchronisation, spectral statistics, magnetisation-sector structure, localisation-like diagnostics, and hardware-facing decoherence predictions in Kuramoto-XY quantum simulations.
The paper must remain separate from the DLA-parity hardware paper and the Rust/VQE methods paper:
- The DLA-parity paper is the real-hardware phenomenology and validation anchor.
- The Rust/VQE methods paper is the reproducible software and benchmark anchor.
- This paper is the Hamiltonian-mechanism and falsifiable-prediction anchor.
Core Hamiltonian¶
The model family is:
where H_XY is the Kuramoto-derived heterogeneous XY Hamiltonian and M is
the total magnetisation operator. The FIM term is interpreted conservatively as
a collective magnetisation-feedback term inspired by information geometry.
Safe claim boundary at project start¶
Safe now:
- The Hamiltonian family is mathematically definable.
- The term creates an explicit sector-dependent energy contribution through
M^2. - The existing package has the infrastructure needed to generate Hamiltonians, VQE ansaetze, exact small-n references, benchmark artefacts, and IBM hardware packages.
- The previous DLA-parity study demonstrates that hardware claims must be controlled for depth, popcount, layout, readout, and calibration context.
Not safe yet:
- Do not claim a demonstrated universal protection principle.
- Do not claim quantum advantage.
- Do not claim strict many-body localisation unless the diagnostics support the term and the limitations are stated.
- Do not claim hardware robustness until equal-depth IBM runs exist.
- Do not use old internal or application numbers as paper claims unless they are regenerated into committed JSON/CSV artefacts.
Scientific questions¶
- Does
H_FIMproduce a predictable magnetisation-sector energy structure? - Does increasing
lambdachange level-spacing statistics relative to plain heterogeneous XY? - Does the FIM term reduce entanglement growth or scrambling in a way that is visible in small-n exact simulation?
- Does the term predict sector-resolved survival or leakage differences under calibrated noise models?
- Which predicted effects are large enough to justify a minimal IBM pilot?
- If IBM hardware disagrees with simulation, which confound explains the failure: excitation count, circuit depth, layout, readout, calibration drift, or the absence of a real FIM mechanism?
Required offline artefacts before IBM runs¶
Every numerical paper claim must come from committed artefacts.
Minimum artefact set:
data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_spectrum_summary_2026-05-05.json— generated initial n=4,6,8 exact spectrum artefact.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_spectrum_summary_2026-05-05.csv— generated compact spectrum table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_sector_spectrum_summary_2026-05-05.csv— generated magnetisation-sector spectrum table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_level_spacing_summary_2026-05-05.json— generated full-spectrum and sector adjacent-gap-ratio artefact.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_level_spacing_summary_2026-05-05.csv— generated adjacent-gap-ratio table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_entanglement_summary_2026-05-05.json— generated low-energy eigenstate bipartition-entropy artefact.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_entanglement_rows_2026-05-05.csv— generated per-eigenstate entropy table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_entanglement_aggregate_2026-05-05.csv— generated entropy aggregate table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_sector_survival_prediction_2026-05-05.json— generated commutator and sector-conservation artefact.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_sector_survival_summary_2026-05-05.csv— generated commutator and maximum off-sector-coupling table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_sector_survival_rows_2026-05-05.csv— generated per-sector energy-barrier table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_vqe_ground_state_summary_2026-05-05.json— generated small-n FIM VQE ground-state comparison artefact.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_vqe_ground_state_rows_2026-05-05.csv— generated per-seed VQE table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_vqe_ground_state_aggregate_2026-05-05.csv— generated aggregate VQE table.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_ibm_candidate_protocol_2026-05-05.json— generated non-submitting IBM pilot candidate protocol.data/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/fim_ibm_candidate_protocol_2026-05-05.csv— generated candidate circuit table.
Initial artefact hashes:
| Artefact | SHA256 |
|---|---|
fim_spectrum_summary_2026-05-05.json |
451442c677b73419a5826fd22d3426f498a5e1186545987067ee2f3e240cef5e |
fim_spectrum_summary_2026-05-05.csv |
aadcd6426c66967f3f92441c2114def324c68199958dff5d6a23acf586efcc9f |
fim_sector_spectrum_summary_2026-05-05.csv |
9e957d1d16e16cf3f41bec0644cdc508586ff716e52f61810d723c91dcdddc53 |
fim_level_spacing_summary_2026-05-05.json |
dfcc2882e561100c6c07afc2518e5b35c863628dc015c22f2d12e75ad931f959 |
fim_level_spacing_summary_2026-05-05.csv |
4874687619524561b819e7397d5e6c599e35e9ea569015149c0f076a6dec1cf8 |
fim_entanglement_summary_2026-05-05.json |
ea9a8b81ecad09b9e354e50e61053f816263e44686660e5a3fc6fcb147c2692a |
fim_entanglement_rows_2026-05-05.csv |
980e54502b61f409d2d631cc2cdc136ed841e16273702f247864a8a0772b9e5b |
fim_entanglement_aggregate_2026-05-05.csv |
3f0c1951e7491b0ec0cde01cd7abe0914cd598e7c91d2e57bf5c745187d109f5 |
fim_sector_survival_prediction_2026-05-05.json |
addfa842cd81e1f38f3582baabf7cc3fdffc250ceeae66f922f61c6abde7fd72 |
fim_sector_survival_summary_2026-05-05.csv |
a27931c7add47c08c3a3545a5e79952f73ce63e10dddc495bbddbab23623095e |
fim_sector_survival_rows_2026-05-05.csv |
d2f243c11a73b98851c436528328ac5345b665506bd27cf792209b904a4f65be |
fim_vqe_ground_state_summary_2026-05-05.json |
8d25ed4ba4593778b5f96b88ed1c571ebb04e03bcf779bdc0911a160e6792ecf |
fim_vqe_ground_state_rows_2026-05-05.csv |
c8ab197a7c7f5a60783ae76dc6f8d7c9eeb5abc75ae987ced721d9be81bdf759 |
fim_vqe_ground_state_aggregate_2026-05-05.csv |
cf6305f59c7b207b41eda11654e9a15df176f65cd97404140e935657f0bb2d51 |
fim_ibm_candidate_protocol_2026-05-05.json |
9b76136c7bc090f9738fcad58eab7f5b1b8bb5f26ede7ebfc32c114234407839 |
fim_ibm_candidate_protocol_2026-05-05.csv |
a577bfbd082d4528ed6471dfa95ac186b7619fd1822be99a08cf5b160eda4ac4 |
Minimum scripts:
scripts/analyse_fim_spectrum.py— implemented initial exact spectrum and magnetisation-sector summaries.scripts/analyse_fim_level_spacing.py— implemented initial adjacent-gap ratio summaries for full spectra and magnetisation sectors.scripts/analyse_fim_entanglement.py— implemented low-energy eigenstate bipartition-entropy summaries.scripts/analyse_fim_sector_survival.py— implemented commutator, ideal-sector-conservation, and per-sector energy-barrier summaries.scripts/benchmark_fim_vqe_ground_state.py— implemented small-n VQE ground-state scoring against exact dense diagonalisation.scripts/prepare_fim_ibm_pilot.py— implemented a non-submitting IBM pilot candidate protocol with QPU gates and falsification rule.
Proposed paper structure¶
- Introduction and motivation.
- Kuramoto-XY mapping and collective FIM-inspired feedback.
- Magnetisation-sector decomposition induced by
M^2. - Exact small-n spectral and localisation-like diagnostics.
- VQE and ansatz implications.
- Noise-model survival predictions and IBM pilot design.
- Discussion: what the term supports, what it does not support, and what the hardware can falsify.
- Data and code availability.
Initial manuscript draft:
paper/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/scpn_fim_hamiltonian.texpaper/scpn_fim_hamiltonian/scpn_fim_hamiltonian_refs.bib
Publication stance¶
The paper should be framed as a theoretical/computational physics note with hardware-facing predictions. It should not be framed as a hardware-confirmed result until the IBM pilot exists.
The current manuscript-safe claim boundary is recorded in
docs/scpn_fim_claim_boundary_2026-05-05.md.
The first IBM-readiness step is also complete: local, non-submitting circuit
preparation generated fim_ibm_circuit_preparation_2026-05-05.json and .csv.
This does not replace live backend transpilation.
Recommended venues after artefacts exist:
- arXiv preprint first.
- Quantum Science and Technology, Physical Review A, or New Journal of Physics depending on final scope and whether IBM data are included.
- If the result remains purely computational, SoftwareX/JOSS is not the right target; the methods paper already covers software.
Decision gate for IBM runs¶
IBM runs are justified only after offline artefacts identify the smallest falsification experiment with a predicted effect large enough to survive hardware noise.
Minimum IBM pilot:
- n=4 only.
lambda = 0plus two non-zero values selected from offline artefacts.- Equal-depth circuits.
- Matched qubit layout where possible.
- Explicit magnetisation/popcount controls.
- Same-day readout calibration or parity-readout correction.
- Fixed shot budget and pre-registered stop rule.
Continuation to n=6 or n=8 requires the n=4 pilot to show a stable sign or a clear falsification that motivates the next experiment.
Immediate next step¶
Inspect the generated artefacts and draft the manuscript claim table. The current generated artefacts establish the exact small-n spectrum, magnetisation-sector energy structure, adjacent-gap diagnostics, low-energy bipartition entropy, ideal sector-conservation checks, VQE ground-state baseline, and a non-submitting IBM pilot candidate protocol.
Important scientific boundary: in the ideal model, H_XY, H_FIM, and
H_XY + H_FIM conserve total magnetisation. The FIM term changes sector
energies and low-energy structure, but it does not create ideal unitary leakage
between magnetisation sectors. Any IBM leakage or survival asymmetry must
therefore be tested as a noise, state-preparation, transpilation, layout, or
readout phenomenon.